
Sunday, October 30, 2011
How much is your country worth?

Saturday, October 29, 2011
La Granada
What's in a Name?
"Adolf Hitler And Aryan Nation: Parents Who Gave Children Nazi Names Lose Custody"
Sunday, October 23, 2011
A Rose...
Today, it is still used as the plant badge of England and is seen historically throughout the city. It was also used as a symbol on the twenty pence piece.
ETA's Crest
In lieu of recent developments, I choose the symbol of ETA, and considering what it stands for, they may have to choose a new symbol soon. The words at the bottom mean "keep up on both" while the both refers to the snake and the hatchet. The snake represents politics while the hatchet represents the armed struggle that ETA has created. Since ETA just announced a cessation of armed activity and a permanent cease fire, their once prominent symbol is a bit defunct. In fact, if ETA were to change their symbol, the change could encourage authorities to take their word more seriously, despite broken ceasefires in the past. Because of this, perhaps we should keep up on ETA's crest a little more closely in the coming months.
Polo

Handshake vs. Kisses
Swoosh
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Burlusconi survives number 53
1. will Burlisconi survive to see early elections?
2. Have the protests in Rome been enough to secure the demise of Burlisconi
3. Is Burlisconi using the slot of Prime Minister to temporarely escape prosecution?
links:http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2011/10/20111014919196979.html
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Italia
The Eiffel Tower
Innocent? Not quite...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15296244
An Alternative to Sarkozy

One Significant Roundel
One of the first symbols you come to appreciate in London is without a doubt the Underground Roundel. It comes as a welcome sight to anyone traveling and commuting in London. After using a few different cities' subway systems, I prefer London's "Tube" to most, and for good reason. While reading up on the origins of the symbol I discovered that the Underground is the oldest underground train system in the world.
Sevilla
During my time in Sevilla, I repeatedly saw this symbol throughout the city. On the flags, the buildings, and even sidewalks, it was located throughout the city. "NO8DO" is the motto of Sevilla, and a bit of a legend for the city. The symbol stands for "No me ha dejado" or "It has not abandoned me." It comes from a legend, when King Alfonso X was king, his son, Sancho IV, tried to lead a revolt to take the throne from his father. The people of Sevilla remained loyal to King Alfonso, and he rewarded them with the motto, "No me ha dejado." This is a very important symbol for the people of Sevilla and is seen and respected throughout the town.
Guiness

Ireland's drinking problem
1.Is irelands drinking problem truely damaging?
2. Should the government intervene?
3. What problems could alcohol impose on their socialist medical system
Stone of Scone
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
First Homosexual Retirement Home
Is a homosexual specific home necessary? Could the horrible tactics of one ruler change the views of an entire generation? Does a homsexual specific retirement home put Spain ahead of other European countries in homosexuality acceptance?
Finally Over? But where is the Murderer?
The murder case involving Amanda Knox, a student at my University in Seattle, has been continually evolving and changing for the last four years. The exact timeline of events is stated clearly in this article: http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2011/10/04/internacional/1317724323.html in a Spanish newspaper called El Mundo. On November 1, 2007 a British student named Meredith Kercher was murdered in her Italian apartment where she was studying abroad with the Erasmus program. Amanda Knox, her American roommate claims to have been at her boyfriend’s house at the time of the murder, but later revised her story, after her boyfriend didn’t have the same alibi. Here is where the trouble lies and my questions begin. The problem with this case, and many other cases is that the story of the accused is highly suspicious and often controversial. Yet, this Monday, Amanda Knox and her boyfriend were freed and declared innocent. Now the case has no potential murderers or convincing stories about exactly what happened that night. Someone was murdered, but because there is no hard evidence against the suspicious accused, they were let go. One comment on this article states: “Do not know what to say… and that’s what the judge and jury must have thought so they have released: there is no evidence, and no evidence, no crime”.
Is there a fundamental flaw in a justice system that allows the only suspects for a case and suspects that have on more than one occasion changed and revised their story about where and what they were doing on the night of the murder go because there is no hard evidence?
The above question goes back to the case of Troy Davis who was executed a couple weeks ago. His case was one of the most publically debated cases in a long time. The problem people had with executing him was that though he had gone through numerous trials and it was beyond reasonable doubt that he was indeed guilty of the crime, there was not a lot of hard evidence. His case ended the opposite way of Knox’s. How much hard evidence is necessary to be legal and ethical in these cases?
Should there be a time limit or cap on the number of times a case can be reopened?
Controversial Changes in Abortion Law
Russian Democracy?
Throughout Putin's time in office, and followed by Medvedev, opposition has been silenced. Russia practices a "managed democracy" where the television is under tight control and legitimate opposition is often not allowed to run for election. There is little doubt that Putin will not win the elections in March. In Russia, though most protesting Putin's power are silenced, most are silently accepting the leaders hold on the country. What I found most interesting in the article was that, the Kremlin (Russian Government) defends its actions, "by pointing to the "mindlessness" of Russians and the lack of a strong civil society." If a population is not willing to stand up for its rights does that make it ok for a government to just take them? Or is it the opposite, that people do not have the right to their rights unless they fight to keep them?
http://www.economist.com/node/21530997
Monday, October 3, 2011
Foul play in the world bank?
1. is the integrity of the World Bank at risk?
2. Is the World Bank trying to hide corruption?
3. Is the World Bank's restrictions driving third world nations to corruption?
Source:http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2008/01/2008525123833306876.html
Sunday, October 2, 2011
The Basics
Availability
Words from across the board come to mind when looking at an image of a wedding ring; love, devotion, unavailable, ball-and-chain. Whatever your take on the wedding ring, it is an undeniable symbol in our everyday life. Typically, in western societies the ring is worn on the left finger for various reasons, the most common of which is because of tradition. Other reasons include the fact that the left hand is most often the non-dominant hand and is therefore used less so the ring will stay in the best shape. One more reason I happened upon is that the left ring finger is connected to a major vein that runs from the heart, so it has more of a connection to the wearer.Murciélago
Euskadi

The District...
I go to school in Washington, D.C. and I have always wondered about the symbolism behind the D.C. flag. Washington, D.C. is not a state, it is a district under the control of the federal government. Residents of D.C., not those like me who are just passing through, are very passionate about the fight for D.C. statehood. Their license plate has a picture of the flag and the statement "No Taxation Without Representation" a battle cry of early American Revolutionaries. They often use this phrase to describe their plight, as D.C. has no voting representation in Congress. The debate is heated, just last year the mayor was arrested for protesting outside Congress. Throughout all the debate and passion, the D.C. flag remains a strong symbol for residents.
The D.C. flag is based on the design for George Washington's family coat of arms. George Washington picked the location for the capitol city. Not only is D.C. named after George Washington but his influence and reference to him can be seen throughout the city. It makes complete sense that D.C. would chose to also honor George Washington in it's flag, as George Washington was the founder of the city and a fierce fighter for independence.





